Monday, July 28, 2014

Fwd: RP-2014-45: Money Market Funds



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Guidewire <irs@service.govdelivery.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:28 AM
Subject: RP-2014-45: Money Market Funds
To: iammejtm@gmail.com


Bookmark and Share

IRS.gov Banner
IRS GuideWire July 23, 2014

News Essentials

What's Hot

News Releases

IRS - The Basics

IRS Guidance

Media Contacts

Facts & Figures

Problem Alerts

Around The Nation

e-News Subscriptions


IRS Resources

Compliance & Enforcement

Contact My Local Office

Filing Options

Forms & Pubs

Frequently Asked Questions

News

Taxpayer Advocate

Where to File


Issue Number:    RP-2014-45

Inside This Issue


Revenue Procedure 2014-45 describes the circumstances in which the Internal Revenue Service (Service) will not treat a redemption of shares in a money market fund (MMF) as part of a wash sale.  Revenue Procedure 2014-45 responds to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules that change how certain MMF shares are priced.

Revenue Procedure 2014-45 will be published in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2014-33 on August 11, 2014.

Back to Top


Thank you for subscribing to IRS GuideWire, an IRS e-mail service. If you are a Tax Professional and have a specific concern about your tax situation, call the IRS Practitioner Priority Service 1-866-860-4259.

This message was distributed automatically from the IRS GuideWire mailing list. Please Do Not Reply To This Message.


Update your subscriptions, modify your password or email address, or stop subscriptions at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page. You will need to use your email address to log in. If you have questions or problems with the subscription service, please contact subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com.

This service is provided to you at no charge by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).


This email was sent to iammejtm@gmail.com by: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) · Internal Revenue Service · 1111 Constitution Ave. N.W. · Washington DC 20535 Powered by GovDelivery



--
Jeremy Tobias Matthews

No comments:

Post a Comment